Hunt denies the charge, stating that the difference is made up from revenue
from new construction and development. Levine counters with the argument
that Venice taxpayers end up footing the bill for the developers, not the other
way around, and that Hunt has been dishonest with council and the city at large about so many
things that even the papers have taken him to task on severe credibility
issues.
Hunt states that the Taxpayers League is fallacious. Levine
states that Hunt is a liar.
And on and on and on.
It could drive a reformed alcoholic to drink. I mean the strong stuff: Drano,
bleach, sulfuric acid. Anything that might cause enough pain to ensure that this
is actually reality, that city politics hasn't become a massive collective
hallucination.
Oops, I did it again
While Hunt beats his chest and proclaims his honesty, it must be
noted that earlier that same day, he was, shall we say, less than honest with
council about a contract with computer consultant Mike Stewart and DKE Commerce.
In hyping Stewart to council in support of a tech contract that Venice Florida!
dot com feels is unnecessarily bloated,
and that even Councilwoman Martha Hanneman stated she has strong reservations
about, Hunt told council that Stewart provides support to both Bon Secours
Hospital and the Venice Area Chamber of Commerce. It's a claim Hunt has made in
the past when asked about nebulously worded invoices that have been submitted to
the computer department from Stewart.
It's simply not true, according to both organizations.
The Chamber uses noted and respected Venice gearhead Van Vangor for support
functions and cannot remember having dealings with Stewart, either as DKE or in
his previous company, Gulf America Computers. "Maybe we bought some
computers from Gulf America a long time ago, but if we did, they're not here
anymore," a Chamber employee told us.
The Chief Information Officer at
Bon Secours, Ted Bailey, claims to have never heard of Stewart or DKE, and
stated that if Stewart was doing consulting work on any of the hospital's
computers, he would know about it.
Oooops. George, about that credibility thing.... ah, nevermind.
Do not pass Go, do not collect $200 (who's this Miranda dude, anyway?)
Levine was transported to the South County Jail, where he was given a
breathalyzer and was questioned about his drinking habits and a few other items
(he blew a 0.0). Then he was transported up to the main jail in Sarasota. All
without being read his Miranda, according to Levine. "Other guys were
getting read their rights and signing the forms. They never got to me,"
Levine shrugs. "I'm told this might be important."
As to his jailhouse experience? "It was hysterical, in a way,"
Levine stated. "I'm 75 years old and I'd never been in jail before. I'm
sitting around with about five guys and they're all talking about what they got
arrested for. This one a burglary, that one for punching somebody, etc. Then
they get to me and look silently, waiting for my story. So I tell them I'm in
here because I called the City Manager a liar. All of a sudden they're throwing
their fists in the air yelling in anger, I'm thinking I'm gonna get attacked,
only they're not angry at me. They can't believe you can get thrown in jail for
such a thing, and it suddenly dawns on me that these guys have more respect for
the democratic process than our own city government does."
Bad behavior or criminal behavior?
Was Levine's behavior caustic? You bet, but no less caustic than Hunt's
behavior earlier in the same meeting. Go back up the page and listen to Hunt's
and Levine's respective rhetoric in the audio files. Listen to the rage in both
voices: the level of contempt is nearly identical. Bob Vedder ain't all wrong
when he stated that these meetings deserve to be civil (see Vedder's quote in
the sidebar above), but if you follow the logic that incivility is an
actionable criminal offense, Levine shouldn't
have been the only handcuffed passenger in the paddy wagon by a long shot.
Hunt was the initial instigator in this particular incident. He threw out the
taunts, then cried foul and hid behind the teacher while wiping fake
tears on her skirt. That's not to say that Levine was an innocent: he threw it
back with equal, if not greater, measure. This was a schoolyard scrap
between two guys who are known for not getting along well in the same
sandbox.
Then you add in Myers calling
Levine a hyena and Levine's response of calling Myers an idiot and a
drunk. The whole affair was childish. Hunt, Levine and Myers all deserved a trip to
the principal's office.
Bad behavior? Definitely, but was it criminal? The courts will have to make that
determination, and that process will start on October 21 when Levine is
scheduled to enter a plea before Judge Barbara Briggs at the South County
Courthouse.
Contrary to some
printed reports, at no time did Mayor Calamaras ever call for Levine to be arrested. In
fact, quite the opposite is true.
Councilman Burt Brown at one point excitedly yelled out for Levine's
arrest. Both the mayor and the vice-mayor downplayed Brown's exuberance
and requested that Levine simply be removed from council chambers.
How that will play out in Judge Briggs' courtroom should Levine
enter a plea of not guilty is anybody's guess, but count on it being a
factor.
Those pesky constituents should not be allowed to be such whiners
Council members and the city manager have complained long and loud that they
shouldn't have to put up with verbal haranguing from their constituents, that it
is improper, that it impinges upon their rights as public servants.
Unfortunately, once you take on the mantle of public office, you have to give up
a lot of comforts and protections that the private sector affords. Public office
would be a great thing if you didn't have to put up with those pesky
constituents.
Ultimately, the mayor and council bear the blame for fostering
an atmosphere of incivility over the past year or two, an 'us versus them'
mentality aimed at anyone who comes before them with a complaint. As lawmakers,
they have tolerated and looked the other way at a great deal of lawlessness over
the past two years, leaving citizens and city employees feeling like they have
little recourse other than to yell and scream and shout.
When lawmakers tolerate and promote lawlessness, they should not be surprised
when anarchy rears its ugly head. They have only themselves to
blame.