| ||||||||||||||||
|
|
Got a comment? Make it here.
Hallucination #1: There is no construction Behrens' own staff picked up on the fact that the nightclub was going through extensive reconstruction without any construction permits or inspections, this as far back as late August of last year. Staff members were ready to slap the business with code violations when a curious set of incidents sidetracked them. In September of 2007, Code Enforcement Officer John Patek was ordered off of the property by tavern co-owner Mike Vellucci after Patek observed ongoing construction work in progress. Patek called the Venice Police, who calmed Vellucci down, but it was decided that the inspection would be held off for a bit. Behrens reportedly visited the property within a few days after conferring with Patek. Patek noted a number of construction permit violations, none of which he has been allowed to follow up on. Meanwhile Behrens had taken the formal stance that no construction was taking place at the site and that the new renovations were limited to painting and the moving of some furniture. "They haven't done any construction, it's the same layout as Norma Jean's," Behrens told me in an interview on January 17th. Norma Jean's is a restaurant/bar that previously occupied the same space. The building had been vacant for two to three years after Norma Jean's moved into their new digs on South Tamiami Trail, just outside of city limits.
Hallucination #2: We have no photos
Hallucination #3: Just painting and moving some
furniture Despite my inquiries, the numerous complaints to city hall, and even a published rant in the Gondolier's Let 'Em Have It column, the city manager and council seemed to be in no hurry to look into the matter. A recent set of inspections on the site for plumbing and electrical, based on an application for an occupancy permit, reportedly uncovered a number of new problems. I'll be taking a look at those documents sometime in the next week or so as time permits.
Hallucination #4: Those are just planned changes, they
haven't been built yet At the beginning of the January 17th meeting, Behrens indicated that he was ignorant of the sheer existence of Tavern on the Island -- he had no idea what I was talking about. I had to describe the place and location to him, whereupon he he seemed to remember something about the place: "Oh, yeah. I heard about them. Are they open yet? I didn't know they had opened already." Behrens stated that he hadn't seen the location yet. When I reminded him that he had responded in person to the owner's request to prevent Code Enforcement Officer John Patek from performing any future inspections, he suddenly remembered being at the location while insisting that he knew that no construction work had been done. Remember, only minutes before he had told me that he had never heard of the place. OK, moving right along. I informed Behrens that I had been to the site and that I had observed construction taking place, notably the tavern's main bar and drink server station, which was half-completed when I visited the bar prior to its opening. Behrens insisted that the work was cosmetic and that the bar and drink serving area were leftovers from Norma Jean's, this despite my own account of seeing the bar in an unfinished state several months prior.
Hallucination #5: These planned changes already exist
as they aren't really changes, they're leftovers from a previous tenant The plans showed the carpentry and partial plumbing layout for the tavern and bathrooms, indicating a new bar and new bathroom fixtures. Behrens explained that none of the work had been done yet, that this was all in the planning and review stage and that, as a result, no construction permit was needed yet. I gave Behrens a look that conveyed what I was thinking -- what planet do you think we are presently on? I informed Hans again that I had been in the establishment and that most or all of what I was seeing in the plans already physically existed. That set off another round of convoluted and mind-boggling backtrack statements. I noted the bar and bathroom had been redone with the new fixtures as shown in the plans. "Right," Behrens stated, "those are all things that are leftover from Norma Jean's." "Look Hans, I worked construction in my teens and twenties. When I was growing up, my step-father owned his own plumbing and heating contracting business. I think I can remember how to read a set of plans, and these clearly show that these are all proposed changes." "No, you don't know what you are talking about and none of this work has been done yet. These are all proposed changes in the plans." Was this dialog being scripted by Lewis Carroll? Joseph Heller, maybe? Behrens had successfully reduced me down to his level of blubbering idiocy. I made one last grasp for reality: "That's what I just said -- the plans indicate proposed changes, but Hans, this work has been done." Behrens smiled and shook his head, somewhat paternally. He then tried to circle me back again to his way of thinking, but my brain suddenly imploded. I couldn't argue with him any more. The bats were coming, descending into the desert under a hot Nevada sun; a heart was loudly beating from under the floorboards; calliope music from Cooger and Dark's Pandemonium Shadow Show could be heard in the distance. I got the hell away from him while I still had the will to live.
And the hits just keep on coming In late February, I forced the city to allow me to interview John Patek. The interview was arranged and moderated by Assistant City Manager Mary Holcombe. Surprisingly, Holcombe gave me free range on my questions as long as I didn't ask Patek to speculate on anything. What I discovered was that in a normal situation like this, where one business was moving in after another moved out, the city would have compiled a fairly thick permit jacket by this point in time. With Tavern on the Island, all that was on file officially was the occupancy permit application and subsequent paperwork along with an after-the-fact sign permit. The city had obviously done some plan review, but no mandatory financial charges had been paid and no permit had been applied for to review and act on the plans (so why was there any plan review going on? why did Behrens and his assistant Dan Weigner have the plans to review?-- that's a set of questions that I forgot to ask, and now I am afraid to as the answer might well land me in an asylum). As such, the submitted plans that I had seen on Behrens' desk are ghost documents, not part of the official record. No building, electrical, mechanical, or plumbing permits had been applied for, this despite numerous citizen complaints and mounting evidence within the city's own records that such work had been taking place. Behrens was still sticking to his story that no construction that would require any permits had taken place. Additionally, no demolition permit had ever been applied for back in 2005 when Norma Jean's had been dismantled and moved out, even though the city had after-the-fact photos on file of the results of the demolition work.
Not an isolated case Additionally, I have been tipped off about other past incidents of a similar nature, more than I can investigate on my own at this time.
John Patten is the head of Web Operations for Creative Pages, and has worked in broadcasting for over 12 years. He can also be incredibly rude at times. |
|